Comprehensive Exam [Exit Interview]: Paper, including critical
analysis
approach
MA in English, Technical & Professional Communication Concentration
East Carolina University
[Use back arrow to return MA Requirements page.]
Part of your comprehensive exam includes a paper, approximately
10-pages
double-spaced. Your 10-page paper can be a traditional academic paper,
such
as a literature review (bibliographic essay), which may or may not
incorporate
application examples.
OR it
can be a 10-page, double-spaced critical analysis of a "practical
application" project that you created for a class.
Whichever approach you take, your "paper" must be approved first by your comprehensive exam director, then distributed to committee members at least two weeks before your comprehensive exam.
For students using the thesis option, this paper (at least 10-page
double-spaced)
demonstrates
your ability to write a thesis, normally being a literature review
(bibliographic
essay) with brief overview of thesis. It is considered a more
traditional
academic paper. You may also submit your prospectus, a planning
document
for your thesis.
For students using the non-thesis option, this "academic" paper can
consist of a
variety of options. For example, you might use a paper and annotated
bibliography from Engl 7705: Ethical Issues in Professional
Communication, revised and (if needed) extended so that the two
documents total at least 10-pages
double-spaced. See the documents indicated in the list below for
examples of
course projects that could be classified as an traditional academic
paper.
Sample traditional academic paper ...
To begin deciding what your paper might evolve from, review the
suggestions
that follow:
The projects just suggested are NOT the only choices. You may use work completed in other courses, depending upon your approach to a project.
Your 10-page paper can be a critical analysis of a major item or
theme in your
portfolio
as it relates to the works on your reading list (works on standard
reading
list
plus works that you have added in consultation with your adviser).
Several different approaches are possible:
Bottom line: You do not have to refer to a specific number
of works on the standard reading list in this critical analysis if your
analysis is better served by incorporating other works. It is
suggested, but not required, that your added reading list items be
chosen from items you use in your critical analysis. In either case,
your committee director needs to approve the approach that you will
use, including your selection of reading list items.
In your critical analysis, you should analyze rhetorically and
reflect
on
the project(s). Consider as appropriate such aspects as background,
purpose,
audience, content, organization, style, visuals, and format/layout, as
well
as cultural dynamics. Projects can be print documents or online ones
such
web site. Projects can be collaborative.
Your critical analysis should incorporate discussion of references
to some of the works on the reading
list, works that you add, and/or other works appropriate for your
project and analysis. You do not necessarily have to revise
your
project, but in your critical analysis, you should demonstrate that you
understand
what revisions are needed and why.
Sample critical analysis ...
The project or projects used should be work that you completed in a class, not be an entirely new project or new projects; however, you, in consultation with your director, may want to revise what you submitted for the class project a bit for it to be suitable for the comprehensive exam. Remember that if you do not revise, and even if you do, your critical analysis should demonstrate that you understand what revisions are needed and why.
To begin deciding what project (projects) you might use as a basis
for
your critical analysis, review the suggestions that follow:
The projects just suggested are NOT the only choices. You may use work completed in other courses.
[top ]
Last modified: 09/27/04
End
of Page