English 1200: Freshman Composition II

Assignments
Course Description
Course Objectives
Grades
Policies
Projects
Studentship
Textbooks

This page is in the process of being updated--Spring Semester doesn't start until January 7, 2003--it will be updated before Christmas!

Section 297 (Honors) meets in Bate 2018 at 8 o'clock MWF
 

Tentative Syllabus for Spring 2003
Date
Topic
Reading
Remarks/Assignments 
#1 Jan. 8-10
Introduction, Overview & Grades
#2 Jan. 13-15-17 Intro to Research WRR 1 & 10 Project #1 Site Study (due 2/14)
#3 Jan. 22-24 Observation and Interview WRR 1 & 10 Handouts No Class on Jan. 20 (State Holiday)
 
#4 Jan. 27-29-31 Presentations WRR 1 & 10 Presentations  
#5 Feb. 3-5-7 Integrating Quotes WRR 1 & 10 Presentations (continued)
#6 Feb. 10-12-14 Writing About Interviews WRR 1 & 10 Peer Reviews & Workshop for Project #1(due 2/14)
#7 Feb. 17-19-21 North Carolina Collection WRR 2 Project #2 Archival Research (due2/28); visit Joyner Library; artifacts
#8 Feb. 24-26-28 Analysis WRR 7 Project #2 draft (due 3/5)
#9 Mar. 3-5-7 Research WRR 2 & 7 No Class All Week (Spring Break)
#10 Mar. 10-12-14 Research & Problem Solving WRR 8; LRJ 1-3 Project #3 Research and Problem Solving (due 4/30)
#11 Mar. 17-19-21 Sources WRR 4 & 11; RO;  LRJ 4 Annotated bibliography; Evaluating Info on the I-NetEvaluating Online Sources Exercise & Accuracy
#12 Mar. 24-26-28 Summaries & paraphrases WRR 3, 5 & A; LRJ 5; iS (Early Registration for Fall 2003 runs all week)
#13 Mar. 31 & Apr. 2-4 Documentation

TBA

Annotated Bibliography draft workshop

#14 Apr. 7-9-11 Argumentation WWR 13& 14  MLA Style; How to Write an Annotated Bibliography

#15 Apr. 14-16

Research Proposals LRJ 7; WRR 12 & B Workshop No Class April 18 (State Holiday) 

#16 Apr. 22-24-26

Proposal LRJ 8 Proposals (due 4/30)
#17 Apr. 28-30 Review for Final Exam WRR, RO, & LRJ Research proposals and process statements due
May 5 (Monday)
Final Exam
0800-1000

 

Textbooks

The Veit Packet, which includes:

Branscomb, H. Eric, and Linda R. Barr. i-Search. Boston: Longman, 2002.

Markus, Mimi. The Longman Researcher's Journal. New York: Longman, 2002.

Munger, David, and Shireen Campbell. Researching Online. 5th ed. New York: Longman, 2002.

Veit, Richard, Christopher Gould, and John Clifford. Writing, Reading, and Research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.

In addition, students will need a floppy disk large enough to hold the work for this class (a doubled sided [DD] high density [HD] 3.5" diskette). If students are planning on using the Writing Center, they will need a floppy disk (to save their work on).


Assignments
General Remarks

Please notice that your fees for this semester include a Computer & Technology Fee, which entitles you to any empty seat at most of the computer labs located around campus. Although some labs are restricted (the BVTE Lab is reserved for BVTE students, the Writing Lab is reserved for freshman composition students, etc.), most students use the lab in Austin.

Also, it's a pretty good idea to keep a backup copy of everything you write. You'll need a 3.5" DS/DD (720 KB) or DS/HD (1.44 MB) "floppy," and these are available at the bookstores.

Format Standards

A professional appearance establishes any writer's credibility and improves reader understanding; thus, all written work submitted for evaluation should follow the criteria below:

If you should discover one or two typing errors (typos), neatly correct the mistake(s) by crossing out the error(s)d writing the correction(s) above (three or more errors require both correction and reprinting).

Late Assignments

There aren't any, but if an assignment is submitted after a deadline has passed, 10 points per class meeting will be deducted for the grade awarded.

Submitting Assignments

Assignments are submitted in either of two ways:


 

 Table 1: Summary of Assignments & Percentage of Final Grade

Project #1 (Site Study)

Oral Presentation (10%)
Paper (15%)

25%
Project #2 (Archival Research)

 

25%
Project #3 (Research and Problem Solving)
Annotated Bibliography (05%)
Research Process Reflection Piece (05%)
Proposal (20%)
30%
Final Exam
10%
Studentship
10%
total
100%


Table 2: Grades and What They Mean

 Letter Grade

What the Grade Means

A (100 - 92)
Your boss would be impressed and remember you at promotion time. 
B (91-83)
Your boss would be satisfied with the job but not over impressed.
C (82-70)
Your boss would be disappointed and ask you to revise before others saw it.
D
(This grade is rarely awarded because assignments are either acceptable--and thus at least a C--or unacceptable--no higher than an F)
F (69-0)
Your boss would start looking for someone to replace you!


Course Description

This course builds on students’ understanding of rhetoric and the processes involved in academic writing.  The focus is on research writing:  on conveying the results of our search for knowledge to a variety of audiences that will learn from and potentially act on the results of that research. Students will conduct research in a variety of forms, learn how to formulate research questions, identify and search both print and electronic sources, incorporate information gained from the library and other sources into their writing, cite secondary sources accurately and responsibly, and apply research writing to problem-solving in the academic and social spheres.


Policies
Attendance

Attendance is required, as is promptness with all assignments

Although "life's little problems" often come up at the darnednest times, students are expected to be in class on time, every time, for all the time allotted to this course because it is in the classroom that information essential for the successful completion of this course is presented. However, if circumstances require your presence elsewhere, you are still responsible for material presented in class. If you anticipate any absences, please see me before hand.

Students will be rewarded for their professional conduct, including active participation in class and support for the work of others.

Participation

Class participation is an important element of the learning process, and students are expected to feel free to freely and openly discuss the subject at hand. Since participation demonstrates (at least in part) your preparedness for each class, you are expected to:

Plagiarism

In the past, I have encouraged students to review their assignments as they prepare for future assignments. In order to do this, students necessarily have to have each assignment returned to them. Some students have allowed their friends (fellow members of clubs, fraternities, or sororities, not to mention those they are dating or their best bud) to make photocopies of their assignments (or worse yet) place their original, corrected copy in club/fraternity/sorority file).

Know this: such action violates the university's Honor Code and does a disservice to students who "copy the 'right' solution" from past assignments. Although former students have thought they'd help their friends, they have really harmed them (by robbing students of the opportunity to learn from their mistakes). The "real world" doesn't follow this unethical practice, and if I find that any of my students (either present or former) participate in this form of plagiarism (by either copying a completed assignment of a former students or by providing an assignment for you to copy) both students will be prosecuted to the fullest of my ability. This is not a warning; it's a promise.


Projects

Project #1 Site Study
Project #2 Archival Research
Project #3 Research and Problem Solving


Project One:  Site Study: Observation and Interview (25%)

For this project, you will conduct primary research through observation and interviews. The research component of the project involves selecting a site where a particular activity occurs, carefully observing and taking notes on the activity, and interviewing at least two people involved in the activity.  As part of your research, you should also collect 1-3 “artifacts” from your chosen site.  Artifacts are items that you can physically and legally take with you from the site (e.g. a program, a leaflet, an instruction card, etc.)

The project has two components. First, it asks you to be descriptive, using observation and interview to answer questions such as who is at the site? What are they doing?  How are they interacting?  What rules or expectations seem to influence the activity they are involved in?  What routine processes are involved in the activity?  What do you notice that creates tension or disrupts the activity?  How do the participants seem to feel about the activity?  How have they come to be involved? What do they see as their role(s)?  You should also consider the physical characteristics of the site: How is the site set up?  What significant objects are there? How are the participants interacting with these objects?  Through careful observation and interview, you should try to discover details that a casual viewer or a regular participant in the activity might not notice. 

Second, the project asks you to compile and analyze the details you have gathered through your observations and interviews.  You should consider questions such as why do you think the participants interact the way they do?  What do you think is the significance of their interactions?  Why might particular procedures, habits, or routines have developed?  What values do they seem to reflect? 

Based on your research, you will produce

1.   An oral presentation of your findings and analysis to the class.  As part of the presentation, you will share your artifacts with the class and explain their significance to the activity you observed. (10%)

2.   A paper in which you explain and analyze the site and the activity. (15%)

Project Two:  Archival research project North Carolina Collection (25%)

For this project, you will apply the skills you’ve developed in selecting and analyzing artifacts to research involving special collections.  Following an orientation session at the North Carolina Collection in Joyner Library, students will select an item from that collection for analysis.  It might be a pamphlet, a magazine, a map, a paperback book: any object from the collection that you want to analyze in detail.  You might want to begin with the following questions:

1.  Where, how, and by whom was this object produced?

2.  What purpose did it serve when it was first produced?

3.  What does it indicate about the place that it was produced?

4.  What does it tell about the time that it was produced?

5.  What does it suggest about its author or maker?

6.  Why do you consider it significant (i.e., an important part of history, or an important part of North Carolina culture)?

Based on your research, you will produce both of the following graded assignments:

An oral presentation (5-7 minutes) of your findings and analysis. As part of the presentation, you will share your artifact with the class and briefly explain its significance. (10%)

A paper in which you provide an expanded version of your presentation contextualizing and explaining the significance of the artifact you have chosen from the N.C. collection. (15%)

Project Three:  Research and Problem-Solving (30%)

For this project you will identify a problem that needs to be addressed.  This problem should have some personal or professional interest for you. Consider, for example, a problem you have noticed on campus, in your local community, or in the profession you see yourself entering after college. You will research this problem, using a variety of sources, with the ultimate goal of writing a well-informed proposal that suggests what should be done to address the problem.  The project includes the following parts:

Evaluative Annotated Bibliography (05%): You will locate and read at least 12 sources, of which not more than four must be online, relating to the problem you have identified.  You will then produce a bibliography, in MLA format, that includes a summary and evaluation of each source.

Research Process Reflection Statement (05%): This component of the project asks you to describe and reflect on your research processes.  What was your knowledge of and belief about the problem before you started your research? How did you go about finding and evaluating your sources?  What surprised you about the search for sources? What difficulties did you encounter in finding sources? What advice would you have for future researchers interested in your topic (or a closely related one)?  Once you found your sources, what interesting or surprising things did you learn? How did your research change your thinking about the problem you selected?  What new topics have you discovered for possible research in the future?  The style of your statement may be informal like the “personal research paper” sample included in WRR.

Proposal (20%):  Based on your research, you will write a research paper in which you suggest what might be done to address the problem.  The paper must reflect careful consideration of the many issues involved in the problem and should acknowledge alternative points of view in the process of explaining why your proposed approach is a good one. You must also determine an appropriate audience for your proposal and direct the paper toward that audience. For example, if you are addressing your high school library’s lack of current resources on computers and are proposing an increase in funding for technology-related book purchases, you should direct your paper to someone—such as the Superintendent of the school district, school board members, or parents of students at the school—who has power to influence funding.

Final Exam (10%):  During the final week of classes, you will be provided with two web site addresses (URLs). Following the guidelines discussed in our textbooks and in class, you will write a 3-4 page paper in which you compare and contrast the credibility of the two sites as sources for research writing. Your evaluation will be due in class during the designated final exam time..

Studentship (10%):  Professional conduct in class participation, particularly through feedback on others’ writing and presentations.


Course Objectives

During this course, students can expect instruction and practice in the following areas:

  1. Formulating significant research questions.
  2. Locating, evaluating, and synthesizing primary, print, and electronic sources.
  3. Integrating source materials into original arguments.
  4. Citing sources accurately and responsibly.
  5. Applying research writing to problem solving in both academia and the work place.
  6. Conveying results of research in a variety of formats (both written and oral) to a variety of audiences that will learn from and potentially act upon those research findings.

Created June 1999
Last Updated on April 24, 2003