|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WRR 14 #15 Nov. 29-Dec. 1-3 Gibaldi, Joseph.
MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 6th ed.
New York: MLA, 2003. Veit, Richard, Christopher Gould, and John Clifford. Writing, Reading,
and Research. 6th ed. Boston: Allyn, Please notice that your fees for this semester include
a Computer & Technology Fee, which entitles you to any empty seat at
most of the computer labs located around campus. Although some labs are
restricted (the BVTE Lab is reserved for BVTE students, the Writing Lab
is reserved for freshman composition students, etc.), most students use
the lab in Austin. Visit http://www.ecu.edu/itcs/lab/
for an up-to-date list of lab locations. In
addition, students will need something electronic on which to save their
documents (a floppy disck, a zip disk/drive, or a CD burner/CD-R/W). A professional appearance establishes any writer's credibility
and improves reader understanding; thus, all written work submitted for
evaluation should follow the criteria below:
There aren't any, but if an assignment is submitted after
a deadline has passed, 10 points per class meeting will be deducted for
the grade awarded.
Assignments are submitted in either of two ways:
Paper Attendance is required, as is promptness with all assignments Although "life's little problems" often come up at the
darnednest times, students are expected to be in class on time, every time,
for all the time allotted to this course because it is in the classroom
that information essential for the successful completion of this course
is presented. However, if circumstances require your presence elsewhere,
you are still responsible for material presented in class. If you anticipate
any absences, please see me before hand.
Students will be rewarded for their professional conduct, including active
participation in class and support for the work of others. Class participation is an important element of the learning
process, and students are expected to feel free to freely and openly discuss
the subject at hand. Since participation demonstrates (at least in part)
your preparedness for each class, you are expected to:
In the past, I have encouraged students to review their
assignments as they prepare for future assignments. In order to do this,
students necessarily have to have each assignment returned to them. Some
students have allowed their friends (fellow members of clubs, fraternities,
or sororities, not to mention those they are dating or their best bud)
to make photocopies of their assignments (or worse yet) place their original,
corrected copy in club/fraternity/sorority file.
Know this: such action violates the university's Honor Code and does a
disservice to students who "copy the 'right' solution" from past assignments.
Although former students have thought they'd help their friends, they have
really harmed them (by robbing students of the opportunity to learn from their
mistakes). The "real world" doesn't follow this unethical practice, and if I
find that any of my students (either present or former) participate in this form
of plagiarism (by either copying a completed assignment of a former students or
by providing an assignment for you to copy) both students will be prosecuted to
the fullest of my ability. This is not a warning; it's a promise! Furthermore,
the ECU Student Handbook defines plagiarism as "Copying the language,
structure, ideas, and/or thoughts of another and adopting some as one's own
original work." Be aware that the writing you do in this course must be your
own work and, primarily, your own words. It is okay to incorporate the words of
others from articles, essays, and interviews as evidence to support your ideas,
but when you do this, you should be sure to cite your sources appropriately. We
will talk about documentation and citations during this course. Penalties for
plagiarism are severe--the can include failing this course, suspension, or even
expulsion from the university, so be sure to see me about any doubts you may
have before you turn in an assignment. You can access the student handbook at
http://www.ecu.edu/studenthandbook/III.htm.
#1 Aug. 25-27
#2 Aug. 30 Sept. 1-3
Intro to Research
WRR 1
Project #1 Site Study (due
10/1)
#3 Sept.
6-8-10
Observation and
Interview
WRR 10
No Class on Sept. 10
(State Holiday)
Handouts;
remembering 9/11/2001
#4 Sept. 13-151-7
Presentations
WRR 1 & 10
Presentations; visit Joyner Library
#5 Sept. 20-22-24
Writing the First Draft
WRR 1 & 10
Peer
Reviews
#6 Sept. 27-29 Oct. 1
Site Study (cont'd)
WRR 1 & 10
Workshop for Project #1(due
10/1)
#7 Oct. 4-6-8
North Carolina Collection
WRR 2
Project #2 Archival Research;(due10/25);re-visit
Joyner Library
#8 Oct. 11-13-15
Invention & Context
WRR 7
Project #2 draft (due
10/20; Project #2
due 10/25)
#9 Oct.
18-20-22
Revision; workshop
No Class Monday 16-18 (Fall Break Day);
Project #2
(due 10/25)
#10 Oct. 25-27-29
Evaluating
Sources;
Evaluating Web SitesWRR 8, 9, 4 & 11
Project #3 Research and Problem Solving (due
12/8);
Doing Research;
Research ?s; possible topics;
Research Project Deadlines;
Research Prospectus (due
11/8
)
#11 Nov. 1-3-5
Annotatons, Summaries & Paraphrases
WRR 3, 5, A & B
(Early Registration for
Spring
2005 runs all week) Annotated bibliography;
(due 11/15); How to Write an Annotated Bibliography;
Citing Online Sources
#12 Nov. 8-10-12
Conferences
WWR 13-14
(Early
Registration for Spring 2005 continues);
Annotated Bibliography (due 11/15);
228th Birthday of the USMC (Ooh Rah!)
#13 Nov. 15-17-19
Argumentation
#14 Nov. 22-24-26
Review Project #3
WRR 13: LRJ 7
No Class Nov. 22-24 (Thanksgiving Break)
Revision
LRJ 8
Conferences for
Project #3 (due
12/6)
#16 Dec. 6-8
Review for Final Exam
WRR, RO, & LRJ
Project #3 due;
Take Home
Final
Exam
Dec. 15 (Wednesday)
1100-1330 Section 010
Textbooks
2004.
General Remarks
Assignments
If you should discover one or two typing errors (typos),
neatly correct the mistake(s) by crossing out the error(s) writing the
correction(s) above (three or more errors require both correction and reprinting).
![]()
Table 1: Summary of Assignments
& Percentage of Final Grade
Project #1
(Site Study)
Project #2
(Archival Research)
Project #3
(Research and Problem Solving)
Research Prospectus (05%)
Annotated Bibliography (10%)
Research Process Reflection Piece
(05%)
Research Paper (20%)
Final Exam
Studentship
Course Description
This course builds on students’ understanding of
rhetoric and the processes involved in academic writing. The focus is on
research writing: on conveying the results of our search for knowledge to a
variety of audiences that will learn from and potentially act upon the results of
that research. Students will conduct research in a variety of forms, learn how
to formulate research questions,
identify
and search both print and electronic sources, incorporate
information gained from the library and other sources into their writing, cite
secondary sources accurately and responsibly,
and apply research writing to problem-solving in the academic and social
spheres.
Attendance
Policies
Plagiarism
Projects
Project One: Site Study: Observation (20%)
For this project, you will conduct primary research through observation and, perhaps, interviews. This project introduces students to methods of field research that are often used in the social sciences and in business and marketing. The research component of the project involves selecting a site where a particular activity occurs, carefully observing and taking notes on the activity, and talking with at least two people involved in the activity. As part of your research, you should also collect 1-3 “artifacts” from your chosen site. Artifacts are items that you can physically and legally take with you from the site (e.g., a program, a leaflet, an instruction card, a bulletin or newsletter, etc.)
The project has two components. First, it asks you to be descriptive, using observation and interview to answer questions such as who is at the site? What are they doing? How are they interacting? What rules or expectations seem to influence the activity they are involved in? What routine processes are involved in the activity? What do you notice that creates tension or disrupts the activity? How do the participants seem to feel about the activity? How have they come to be involved? What do they see as their role(s)? You should also consider the physical characteristics of the site: How is the site set up? What significant objects are there? How are the participants interacting with these objects? Through careful observation and interview, you should try to discover details that a casual viewer or a regular participant in the activity might not notice.
Second, the project asks you to compile and analyze the details you have gathered through your observations and interviews. In the process, you will synthesize and draw inferences about the meaning of what you've observed. You should consider questions such as why do you think the participants interact the way they do? What do you think is the significance of their interactions? Why might particular procedures, habits, or routines have developed? What values do they seem to reflect?
Based on your research, you will produce a detail paper of about 6 pages (1,500 words) in which you explain and analyze the site and the activity, and your artifacts. In the course of preparing the graded portion of this assignment, you may be asked to complete 3 or 4 other short writing exercises and to keep all the notes you have gathered from your observations and interviews. We will spend class time discussing observation strategies, observation analysis, and maybe an oral presentation.
Project Two: Date of Birth Project (20%)
For this project, you will apply the skills you’ve developed in selecting and analyzing artifacts to research involving special collections. Following an orientation session at the North Carolina Collection in Joyner Library, students will select an item from that collection for analysis. It might be a pamphlet, a magazine, a map, a paperback book: any object from the collection that you want to analyze in detail. You might want to begin with the following questions:
For this project, you will compose a paper that tells readers what happened on the day that you were born, not just in your hometown, but also what happened in the local area, the state, the nation, and in the world.
One of the objectives of this assignment is to get you looking in places (in sources) that you’ve never looked before (like the sources mentioned above). Another objective is for you to make something that is important to you (events of your birth day) important to your readers (again, the primary audience for this paper is the typical second semester freshman at ECU who is taking English 1200 this semester).
The North Carolina Collection has microfilms of most of the newspapers in North Carolina and some that are located in our nation’s larger cities. The periodicals (news magazines, general magazines, etc.) are in the journals section of Joyner Library (on the 2nd floor).
Like the N C Collection paper, you will produce a research essay of about 6 pages (1,500 words) in which you contextualize and explain the significance of the events of your birth day. This paper will require 6-12 sources, of which, not less than 6 will be non-internet sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, news magazines, journals, and, in some cases, personal interviews). A successful paper will showcase your ability to find, evaluate, and synthesize relevant sources. Completing this assignment will give you an opportunity to work in an archival collection and to learn something interesting about the day you were born; it will also give you an opportunity to learn research methodology in the humanities.
Project Three: Research and Problem-Solving (40%)
For this project you will identify a problem that needs to be addressed. This problem should have some personal or professional interest for you. Consider, for example, a problem you have noticed on campus, in your local community, or in the profession you see yourself entering after college. You will research this problem, using a variety of sources, with the ultimate goal of writing a well-informed proposal that suggests what should be done to address the problem. The project includes the following parts:
Research Prospectus (05%): The Research Prospectus is a statement of your plans Project #3, and the prospectus contains three elements:
A statement of your research question. Although your topic may be tentative at this stage of the research process, your statement of this question (and, thus, the focus o your research) is based on what you know, and it may be changed as you discover more information.
A paragraph or two about how your research is progressing so far. This summary should include why you chose this topic, what you already know about it, and what you hope to discover. You should also address any successes/problems you've had with this topic or sources.
A working bibliography (a list of sources that you have located thus far). Remember to use the MLA format. Remember that this is a preliminary list (you haven't read and evaluated them yet), so this list will likely vary from the Annotated Bibliography (see below) and the Works Cited page of your Research Paper (see below).
Evaluative Annotated Bibliography (10%): You will locate and read at least 12 sources, of which not more than four must be online, relating to the problem you have identified. You will then produce a bibliography, in MLA format, that includes a summary and evaluation of each source. Annotations should show evidence of careful reaching, critical thought, and demonstrate a thorough understanding of the source.
Research Process Reflection Statement (05%): This component of the project asks you to describe and reflect on your research processes. What was your knowledge of and belief about the problem before you started your research? How did you go about finding and evaluating your sources? What surprised you about the search for sources? What difficulties did you encounter in finding sources? What advice would you have for future researchers interested in your topic (or a closely related one)? Once you found your sources, what interesting or surprising things did you learn? How did your research change your thinking about the problem you selected? What new topics have you discovered for possible research in the future? The style of your statement may be informal like the “personal research paper” sample included in WRR (p. 236).
Research Paper (20%): Based on your research, you will write a 8-10 page (2,000 -2,500 words) research paper in which you suggest what might be done to address the problem. This will be a well-researched paper that uses a variety of primary and secondary sources. Your goal will be to describe the problem in detail and propose an informed, well-researched solution to the problem you identify. The successful paper will fully and carefully analyze the problem and explore alternative points of view--and--it will identify and address an appropriate audience and use evidence in ways that will accommodate that audience. For example, if you are addressing the overnight guest policy for ECU's dorm, direct your paper to someone—such as the Chancellor or the Dean of Student Affairs—who has the power to affect the change you recommend..
Final Exam (10%): During the final week of classes, you will be provided with a list of web site addresses (URLs). Following the guidelines discussed in our textbooks and in class, you will evaluate these sites. Your evaluation will be due in class during the designated final exam time.
Studentship (10%): In order for you to do well in this class, attendance is imperative. Class meetings will be used:
to discuss reading material,
complete in-class writing assignments and group work,
participate in peer review activities,
receive information about your assignments and writing expectations,
provide feedback to others, and
receive feedback on your work from your instructor.
Thus, there is NO substitute for attendance (poor
attendance = poor participation = poor studentship).![]()
| Course Objectives |
During this course, students can expect instruction and practice in the following areas:
| Created Oct. 17, 2003
Updated on Nov. 29, 2004 |