| English 6721: Copyediting for Professional Communicators | ||||||
Texts |
Projects |
Evaluation |
Policies/ Procedures |
Communication |
Schedule |
Kain's Home |
Blackboard |
Links on the Rude Companion Web site |
|||||
This course will introduce you to the basic principles of editing documents for grammar, syntax, organization, professional style, emphasis, and audience awareness. The course will focus on the common methods of marking documents using established symbols and conventions as well as electronic methods of editing. We'll also cover distinguishing between grammatical and stylistic comments; principles of contextual editing; basic editorial activities; methods for analyzing, critiquing, and revising manuscripts for different audiences; and techniques for creating successful writer/editor dialogue.
This course allows you the opportunity to investigate different styles and style manuals and will ask you to create documents using styles to demonstrate your comprehension of the various formats and conventions. We'll also discuss the role of the editor in organizational settings and ethical issues in editing. The course objectives are
While working on editing problems will certainly help you with your own writing (both stylistically and mechanically), I'm assuming that you all have a good grasp of English grammar. However, if you have any problems or questions about grammar issues or about grammar terms, let me know.
Carolyn Rude, Technical Editing, 4th Edition. Allyn and Bacon, 2005.
Chicago Manual of Style, 15th Ed.
Dictionary
The Associated Press (AP) Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law. Ed. Norm Goldstein. Cambridge MA: Perseus Publishing, 2002.
Economist Style Guide, 8th . Ed. London: Profile Books, 2004.
Rubens, Philip. Science and Technical Writing: A Manual of Style. NY: Routledge, 2001.
Woolever, Kristin R. Writing for the Technical Professional. 2nd Ed. NY: Longman, 2002. ISBN 0-321-08416-0
Jones, Dan. The Technical Communicator's Handbook. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2000.
St. Martin's Press also publishes Handbooks for both Technical and Business Writing, authored by Alred, Brusaw and Oliu.
Cook, Claire Kehrwald. Line by Line: The MLA's Guide to Improving Your Writing. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1985.
For each of the following assignments, I'll start a discussion thread on Blackboard that will include a link to a more complete description of the assignment requirements and evaluation criteria.
Project |
Description |
% |
|
Use Chicago Manual of Style guidelines to copyedit and revise a document provided. |
10% |
|
|
Use Chicago Manual of Style guidelines to complete comprehensive edit of a document provided (hard copy using editing marks). |
10% |
|
|
Use Chicago Manual of Style guidelines to complete comprehensive edit of a document provided (electronic document using track changes and comments). |
15% |
|
|
Project 4: Comprehensive edit of a longer document |
You'll work in pairs to develop a style guide, edit a document, and create a table of contents and index. |
20% |
|
Project 5: Apply a Style |
For this assignment, you'll prepare brief definition/explanation. Information you need to prepare your definition is provided in the assignment sheet. You'll prepare the paper to meet the guidelines of a style guide other than Chicago (for example, AP, APA, International, or another style of your choice). After the papers have been prepared, you'll review and compare them and write short responses on a Blackboard discussion thread about the differences in the purposes and styles of different manuals. |
15% |
|
Discussion |
The readings and projects for this class will raise a number of practical, theoretical, and ethical issues related to editing. We'll use discussion to exchange ideas, ask questions, get and give assistance, and explore issues. I'll evaluate discussion on your overall participation. Minimum Requirements: You should post at least twice to five (5) of eight (8) discussion topics listed on the schedule and set up on Blackboard. But feel free to post as often as you wish and to suggest additional topics threads. The discussion board is where we can share ideas and help each other. Remember, if you have a question, someone else is probably wondering about the same thing. To earn a B for discussion, meet the minimum requirements for discussion. To earn an A, exceed them by participating more frequently. |
10% |
|
Review and comment on editing problems; plan for future improvement. |
var |
|
|
Short Activities |
(4) Short activities are related to course projects. These are meant to reinforce your skills and prepare you for the projects. |
20% |
Evaluations will reflect how well you have met an assignment's requirements, your use of professional style, tone, and conventions; and your correct use of English. Papers that contain serious grammatical errors (sentence fragments, run-on sentences, comma splices, etc.) cannot receive a grade higher than "C." Other evaluation criteria include the following:
Grade |
Criteria |
A |
Demonstrates a superior analysis of the assignment; excellent attention to the content, organization, design, and style that addresses both the practical and rhetorical requirements of the particular situation. Excellent choice and use of editing concepts, guidelines, and styles. Writing is clear, coherent, fluid, and stylistically appropriate. Has no major mechanical errors, few minor errors. Shows insight, perceptiveness, originality, and thought. |
B |
Demonstrates thorough, well-organized analysis of the assignment. Shows judgment and skill in the presentation of material appropriate for the situation. Supports ideas well with concrete details. Generally effective use of editing concepts, guidelines, and styles. Written work is interesting, precise, clear, and free of major mechanical errors. Strong, interesting work, although minor problems may be present. |
C |
Meets all basic requirements of the assignment. Provides a satisfactory analysis of the task. Accomplishes its purpose with adequate content, design, and detail. Uses details, organization, appropriate expression, and acceptable mechanics for the context. Shows understanding of editing concepts, guidelines, and styles, though application may not be consistent throughout document. Nothing remarkably good or bad about the work. Equivalent work could be used in the professional world with minor corrections. |
D |
Weak in one of the major areas (content appropriate for purpose, organization, style, or mechanics) or offers a routine, inadequate treatment. Application of editing concepts, guidelines, and styles is inadequate or inappropriate. Shows generally substandard work with some redeeming features. |
F |
Fails to meet one or more of the basic requirements of the assignment. May fail to cover essential points, or may digress to nonessential material. May lack adequate organization and show confusion or misunderstanding of genre or context. May use an inappropriate tone, poor word choice, or awkward sentence structure. May be unclear. Poor application of editing concepts, guidelines, and styles. Contains an unacceptable level of major and minor errors. |
To begin the class, you need to follow the instructions for "start up" on the TPC Web site and in messages from Dr. Southard. Please note these instruction differ according to the number of TPC classes you have taken.
I'll post new materials, activities, and discussion threads on Monday of the week they're noted on the schedule. Make sure to check the Schedule and the Blackboard course site to keep current.
All the readings are listed on the Schedule. Please do the readings as early in the week as possible so you're ready for discussion and activities.
All projects and activities are due by midnight of the due date indicated in the Schedule. If a project cannot be completed on time, contact me via email before the due date to arrange an extension.
The formatting for assignments will vary depending on the documents and editing styles we're working with. However, some general formatting, naming, and transmittal guidelines will apply to most assignments:
In this course, plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty will be treated based on the East Carolina University Code of Conduct.
We'll be discussing ethical issues related to editing, citing sources, and acquiring permissions as part of the course. Because this is a graduate level course, I'm assuming that you are all familiar with what constitutes improper uses of sources and copyrighted materials. Sometimes, however, the rules for adequately citing sources and/or the procedures for acquiring permissions are not entirely clear cut. We should discuss any issues as they arise, particularly in terms of the ways in which these areas impact editors and editorial decisions.
East Carolina University seeks to fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Students requesting accommodations based on a covered disability must go to the Department for Disability Support Services, Brewster A-114, to verify the disability before any accommodations can occur. The telephone number 252-328-6799.
We'll be using the asynchronous discussion board utility on Blackboard as the primary means for exchanging ideas about various topics and readings, sharing drafts of projects, and submitting documents for evaluation. I'll also post links, additional readings, sample documents, PowerPoint presentations, answer keys to completed assignment, and other course materials on Blackboard.
To access Blackboard, go to the ECU Web site and click on the Blackboard tab at the top left of the main page content. Once on the Blackboard site, you'll need your ECU mail ID and Password to log in. I've set up the site and added all of you so that when you go to Blackboard you should immediately see a link to this course.
I will check the Blackboard discussions every day. Though I won't post replies to every post of yours, I'll chime in periodically.
Our secondary contact is through email. I prefer that you use your ECU e-mail for this course. Some procedures for corresponding via email include the following:
I try to return e-mails twice a day, late morning and late afternoon. Sometimes I'll respond or send e-mail in the evenings. I don't always respond to e-mails on Saturday. I generally check e-mail on Sunday afternoon.
I don't use IM very consistently, so I avoid it. Feel free to share your IM contact information with others in the class.