Project 1: Review of a Popular Science Book
One way in which science is communicated to the public is through a thriving
"popular science" literature. Both science writers and actual scientists have
forayed into the field, writing books that frequently become bestsellers. These
books pursue diverse purposes: to educate or entertain, to sound the alarm or
to reassure the alarmed, to explain scientific concepts by means of more accessible
subjects or to use science to explain other subjects familiar to the lay reader.
These books also sometimes earn scientists and science writers a great deal
of money and fame.
In most cases, however, the book's strength resides in the writer's ability
to make the scientific content of the book meaningful to readers.
In this project, you will read and review the popular science book of your
choice. You may choose a book from my list or, with my permission, find one
on your own.
Imagine that your review is destined to appear in one of the many book review
forums that commonly review popular science books, such as the New York
Times Review of Books. Your purpose is not only to describe the book,
but to recommend (or not recommend) it to your readers. Of course, you will
also want to explain why you believe that the book is (or is not) worth
reading.
N.B.: While book reviewers are expected to voice their "opinion" about a text,
their role is more complicated than that: they are also expected to evaluate
the book on its own terms. That is, they must determine what the book is attempting
to do, then evaluate its success in fulfilling that goal. So your first step
is to determine just what the author is trying to accomplish in the book.
Criteria for choosing a book
Apply these criteria to select a book:
- Nonfiction, not fiction or biography or reference. Find a book that tells
a story, not a purely practical text (i.e., avoid reference books, dictionaries,
Physics for Dummies-type texts, etc.).
- Popular rather than "scholarly" or "academic" treatment. Find something
intended for the mainstream public, not (or not just) for researchers or scholars.
One way to tell the difference is to examine who publishes the book (an academic
or popular press?), who wrote the blurbs on the back, and who is acknowledged
in the acknowledgements--if it's a bunch of PhD's, it may be an academic rather
than popular book. Another clue is to skim the introduction. If it's identifying
"problems in the research" that the present book tries to solve, it's probably
an academic book. If you have questions about whether your choice is academic
or popular, just ask--we can consider it together.
- Topic in a fairly mainstream area of science (including medical science):
astronomy, biology, botany, geology, biochemistry, chaos theory, physical
anthropology, genomics, environmental science, and the like.
- Full-length treatment of a single topic or tight constellation of topics,
not an article-length piece or an encyclopedia-style collection of short pieces.
The book should be designed to be read cover to cover, not piecemeal.
- Single-authored text, except by permission. (I'm willing to let a couple
folks use anthologies like the annual Best American Science Writing
anthology to provide some counterpoint to the single-authored approach, but
I'd rather not have everyone take this route.)
- Essay collections, if single-authored, are also acceptable as long as the
collection itself has a coherent theme. For instance, Oliver Sacks' Uncle
Tungsten is a series of essays that trace Sacks' singular development
as a psychologist (through optics, chemistry, and other scientific topics)--it'd
work fine. But Sacks' Anthropologist on Mars is a collection of more
or less separate case studies--quite interesting, but less appropriate for
this assignment unless you can make a strong argument for the text's coherence.
- Current, except by permission. If you wish to read something more than four
or five years old, make a case for its enduring value.
Selected bibliography of popular science books
- Myron Arms, Riddle of the Ice: A Scientific Adventure into the Arctic
[climatology]
- Juan Luis Arsuaga, The Neanderthal's Necklace: In Search of the First
Thinkers [anthropology]
- Rachel Carson, Silent Spring [environmental studies; dated, but influential]
- Dorothy L. Cheney and Robert M. Seyfarth, How Monkeys See the World:
Inside the Mind of Another Species [cognitive science; zoology]
- K.C. Cole, The Hole in the Universe [physics]
- Vincent Courtillot, Evolutionary Catastrophes: The Science of Mass Extinctions
[evolution]
- Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene [genetics]
- Niles Eldredge, Reinventing Darwin: The Great Evolutionary Debate
[evolution]
- Stephen Hawking, The Universe in a Nutshell [physics]
- Peter Hoffmann, Tomorrow's Energy: Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and the Prospects
for a Cleaner Planet [environmental studies]
- Olivia Judson, Dr. Tatiana's Sex Advice to All Creation: The Definitive
Guide to the Evolutionary Biology of Sex [evolutionary biology]
- Stuart Kauffman, At Home in the Universe [chaos theory]
- Ray Kurzweil, The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human
Intelligence [cognitive science; artificial intelligence]
- Richard Lewontin, Human Diversity [human biology]
- John McPhee, Annals of the Former World [geology]
- Michael Pollan, The Botany of Desire [botany]
- Richard Preston, The Demon in the Freezer [last year's best-seller
on the Smallpox virus]
- Richard Preston, The Hot Zone [on the Motaba Virus]
- Heather Pringle, The Mummy Congress: Science, Obsession, and the Everlasting
Dead [mummology?]
- Robert Sapolsky, A Primate's Memoir: A Neuroscientist's Unconventional
Life Among the Baboons [primatology; anthropology; social psychology]
- Pat Shipman, Taking Wing: Archaeopteryx and the Evolution of Bird Flight
[paleontology; aeronautics]
- Gregory Stock, Redesigning Humans: Choosing our Genes, Changing our
Future [genomics]
- Bryan Sykes, The Seven Daughters of Eve [genetics; anthropology]
- Bryan Sykes, Adam's Curse: A Future Without Men [human evolution]
This list is is merely a selection of books that I have recently read, heard
about, or spotted on the shelves of a bookstore. You're welcome to choose a
book from this list, but only after studying it further to see if you truly
find the topic compelling. In other words, don't simply pick from the
list--find something that you'd actually choose to read while relaxing on the
beach on vacation. One function of this assignment, I hope, is to make it possible
for you to do some pleasure reading, even if, admittedly, that pleasure reading
will lead to a course project!
One useful list of (mostly) popular science books is the "Science
Friday Bookshelf" (http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/biz/books/allbooks.shtml),
a list of all the books that have been mentioned on NPR's weekly science program,
Talk of the Nation: Science Friday with Ira Flatow. Not all of these
books are appropriate for this assignment, but some are. Or simply visit the
local bookstore's "science and nature" section; peruse the virtual shelves of
Amazon.com or BN.com;
read the dust jackets and skim the introductions. Find a popular science book
that truly fascinates you!
Once you've selected one or two good prospects, send me an email that lists
the following:
- book author, title, publisher, date
- brief description--a cut-and-pasted blurb from the dust jacket is fine,
as is your own two- or three-sentence description--just something that will
help me to ensure that the book is appropriate.
I'll respond as soon as possible so that you can start reading!
Links on this page
http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/biz/books/allbooks.shtml
("Science Friday Bookshelf")
Amazon.com (Amazon.com online bookstore)
BN.com (Barnes and Noble online bookstore)
End of Page
Last modified: 01/06/04